TEA VILLA Luxury Resort

Dhaka, Monday   19 January 2026

Hasanat Kamal

Published: 01:09, 11 January 2026

AI in the Newsroom - Tool or Threat?

Photo: Eye News

Photo: Eye News

Artificial intelligence is quietly reshaping newsrooms around the world. Tools powered by AI are now commonly used for transcribing interviews, summarizing documents, translating text, and even drafting headlines or short articles. For under-resourced newsrooms, these tools promise speed and efficiency. But their growing presence also raises important ethical and professional questions that journalism cannot afford to ignore.

AI systems do not understand truth. They identify patterns, predict likely sequences of words, and generate content based on probabilities. This means they can confidently produce information that sounds accurate but is entirely false. These so-called “hallucinations” are not rare errors; they are a known limitation of current AI models. If such outputs enter the news cycle without proper human oversight, the risk to public trust is serious.

Bias is another concern. AI systems learn from existing data, much of which reflects social, political, and cultural inequalities. When used in journalism, these systems can reproduce or amplify stereotypes, marginalize certain voices, or frame stories in ways that reflect dominant perspectives rather than lived realities. Without careful editorial review, AI-generated content can quietly reinforce the very injustices journalism seeks to challenge.

There is also the danger of overreliance. As automation becomes more common, newsroom pressures may push editors and reporters to trust AI outputs without sufficient verification. This can weaken editorial judgment and blur accountability. When an AI-generated error is published, responsibility does not disappear. The newsroom remains accountable, regardless of whether a machine assisted in the process.

Journalism is not just about producing text. It is about verification, context, ethical judgment, and responsibility to the public. These are human skills, shaped by experience and values, that cannot be automated. AI can assist journalists by handling repetitive tasks or organizing large volumes of information, but it cannot replace the core principles of the profession.

Responsible newsrooms must set clear boundaries around the use of AI. This includes internal guidelines on when and how AI tools can be used, mandatory human review of AI-assisted content, and transparency with audiences about the role technology plays in reporting. Readers have a right to know how information is produced.

AI in the newsroom is neither inherently a threat nor a solution. It is a tool. Whether it strengthens or weakens journalism depends on how responsibly it is used—and whether human judgment remains firmly at the center of the newsroom.

EN/SHA

Green Tea